Who Is Erin Lee? Colorado’s Three Protect Kids Ballot Measures Explained Simply
COLORADO — Colorado voters will decide three citizen-led ballot measures this November dealing with child sex trafficking, school athletics and certain surgeries involving minors.
Behind the effort is Erin Lee, a Northern Colorado mother and parental-rights advocate who serves as executive director of Protect Kids Colorado.
Lee and fellow designated representative Michele Austin helped bring the measures through Colorado’s citizen initiative process. Protect Kids Colorado says thousands of volunteers participated in the petition effort and more than 500,000 signatures were gathered across the three campaigns.
The proposals began as Initiatives 108, 109 and 110. After qualifying for the November 3, 2026 general election ballot, voters will see them as Propositions 133, 134 and 135.
Because ballot language can sometimes be difficult to understand, Patriots First Media is breaking down the three proposals in simple terms.
Proposition 133 — Human Trafficking of Children
Explained simply:
Imagine there is a very serious rule that says adults cannot buy or sell sexual activity involving children.
Proposition 133 would make Colorado law tougher by explicitly including knowingly trading something of value to buy or sell sexual activity involving a minor within the crime of human trafficking of a child for sexual servitude.
Under the proposition, a person convicted of the covered offense would face life in prison without parole or release, while the governor would retain clemency authority.
What does a YES vote mean?
A YES vote means Colorado would adopt the new definition and punishment contained in Proposition 133.
What does a NO vote mean?
A NO vote means Colorado would keep its existing law rather than adopt the changes contained in Proposition 133.
If approved, the measure would apply to offenses committed on or after January 1, 2027.
Proposition 134 — School Sports
Explained simply:
Imagine your school has three kinds of sports teams:
Boys’ teams. Girls’ teams. And teams where boys and girls can play together.
Proposition 134 would require school and college athletic teams to be classified as male, female or coeducational.
Participation on male and female teams would generally be determined according to biological sex as defined by the proposition.
A female student could participate on a male team when the school does not offer a corresponding female team. Students could also participate on coeducational teams.
What does a YES vote mean?
A YES vote means Colorado would adopt the statewide requirements for school athletics contained in Proposition 134.
What does a NO vote mean?
A NO vote means Colorado would not adopt those proposed statewide requirements.
Supporters, including Lee and Protect Kids Colorado, argue the measure would protect fairness, opportunities and safety in girls’ athletics.
Opponents argue the proposal would exclude transgender girls from girls’ teams and could create privacy concerns for students.
Proposition 135 — Certain Surgeries on Minors
Explained simply:
This proposal says that before someone turns 18, doctors generally could not perform surgery for the purpose of changing that young person’s biological sex characteristics in response to the minor’s perception of sex or gender.
The proposition would also prohibit certain government funding, Medicaid reimbursement and insurance coverage from paying for procedures prohibited under the measure.
There are exceptions contained in the proposal, including treatment involving certain medically verifiable disorders of sex development and other specified medical conditions.
What does a YES vote mean?
A YES vote means Colorado would put the surgical restrictions contained in Proposition 135 into state law.
What does a NO vote mean?
A NO vote means Colorado would not enact the proposed restrictions.
Supporters describe the measure as protecting children from making potentially irreversible medical decisions before adulthood.
Opponents argue the proposal would interfere with decisions made by families and medical professionals and could restrict health care for transgender minors.
Who Is Erin Lee?
Lee’s involvement in Colorado’s parental-rights debate began before these three initiatives.
She has publicly said her advocacy began following an experience involving her own daughter and a school program. She subsequently became active in debates involving parental authority, education and gender-related policies.
Lee now serves as executive director of Protect Kids Colorado, an organization advocating for policies it says protect parental rights and children.
Colorado General Assembly records also show Lee has previously been involved as a designated representative in proposed ballot initiatives dealing with parental rights, public education records and parental notification.
The three measures appearing on the 2026 ballot represent one of the organization’s largest statewide efforts.
Three Propositions in Plain English
For voters who don’t want to sort through pages of legal language, the basic questions can be summarized this way:
Proposition 133: Should Colorado adopt the proposition’s tougher definition and life-without-parole punishment for specified child sex trafficking offenses?
Proposition 134: Should Colorado require school athletic teams to follow the proposition’s biological-sex requirements?
Proposition 135: Should Colorado prohibit the surgeries on minors described in the proposition?
Those summaries are not intended to tell anyone how to vote.
They are intended to help Colorado voters understand what each question is asking before they make their own decision.
Colorado voters will have the final say when ballots are counted in the November 3, 2026 general election.
Patriots First Media will continue covering Colorado’s 2026 ballot measures and will provide additional information about arguments from supporters and opponents as Election Day approaches.


These Props should NEVER EVER BE ON A BALLOT! It’s Unbelievable this is even Happening.. VOTE YES ON ALL 3 Initiatives! Protect Our Children from these SICK Democrats and Liberals who are PUSHING THIS ON KIDS!!! Gender Ideologies that are Taught to Pre K and up to 12th Grade! Children should NEVER be used for ADULT SICK EXPERMENTATION!!! 🚨 PROP 135 IS VERY IMPORTANT TO ME. 🚨
And I’m going to say exactly what I believe.
LEAVE. OUR. CHILDREN. ALONE.
My generation chopped off MUFFLERS. Your Generation Chops off PeePees!!!
Now we’re having a statewide debate over surgeries on children intended to alter their biological sex characteristics.
WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED?
These are CHILDREN. Their brains, judgment, identities and understanding of lifelong consequences are still developing. I firmly believe permanent, irreversible decisions involving healthy body parts should WAIT UNTIL ADULTHOOD.
And taxpayers should NOT be forced to pay for procedures they fundamentally oppose. PERIOD.
I also believe doctors who perform sex-altering surgeries on minors should face serious consequences, including losing their medical licenses. Personally, I believe the law should impose extremely severe criminal penalties as well.
And YES, I have personally watched gender-related issues become part of the conversation in schools. I believe schools should get back to their fundamental mission: TEACH OUR CHILDREN. Math. Science. Reading. Writing. History. Give kids an education and let them have the TIME and SPACE to grow up.
Supporters of these procedures call them healthcare and argue these decisions belong to families, patients and doctors.
I strongly disagree.
Children get ONE childhood.
Let them grow.
Let them mature.
Let them become adults before making permanent surgical decisions about their bodies.
My generation chopped off MUFFLERS.
CHILDREN SHOULDN’T BE CHOPPING OFF BODY PARTS.
LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE!
Read Proposition 135 yourself. Know what is actually in it before you cast your ballot.
~Slick ✌️🇺🇸
#Prop135 #Colorado #ProtectOurChildren #LeaveTheChildrenAlone #ParentsMatter #ColoradoVotes